![]() |
|
17 January 2002
|
||
|
ADC Joins Ten Organizations in Letter to DOD
|
||
![]() |
||
|
The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) recently joined ten civil rights organizations in sending a joint letter to the United States Department of Defense (DOD) concerning rules for the proposed military commissions. The following is the text of the letter: VIA FACSIMILE January 14, 2001 The Honorable Donald Rumsfeld Dear Secretary Rumsfeld: We understand from press reports that the Department is considering incorporating various safeguards in the rules for military commissions, which would go a substantial way towards meeting constitutional and international legal requirements of procedural fairness and due process, including:
The press reports did not indicate whether several other equally important due process safeguards have been or will be addressed. These safeguards, which have been spelled out in greater detail in previous correspondence and statements from our various organizations, include:
Such appellate and court reviews should be final and binding. According the President or any other executive officer the ultimate authority to override an acquittal or impose a heavier sentence than approved by the appellate tribunal would vitiate all other due process protections. Commission Jurisdiction. As many of us have written, we believe that jurisdiction of any commissions must be limited to persons captured overseas, who are both engaged in armed conflict against the United States and charged with war crimes targeted against Americans. Individuals charged with terrorism offenses under U.S. criminal laws, if those crimes do not also constitute war crimes, must be tried in U.S. courts rather than by military commissions. Opportunity for Comment. We urge the Department to publish its proposed procedures in draft form and to seek public comment before adopting final rules. The public interest in a transparent rulemaking process is particularly critical with regard to these commissions, which could have extensive and long- lasting ramifications both domestically and internationally. The final rules and the perceived fairness and integrity of the commissions, can only benefit from an open process of public notice and comment on specific rule language. The comment period could be short enough to enable the rules to be finalized quickly. Including these basic guarantees in the provisions for military commissions is necessary to meet constitutional requirements and international legal commitments. We welcome the apparent determination of the Department to ensure that trials by military commission reflect high standards of justice. Doing so will help the United States bring those responsible for the September 11th attacks to justice while preserving the legitimacy of the verdicts both in law and in the eyes of the world. Sincerely, cc: |
||